soulmate

Can't Beat One, Be One. Part One

0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
16 Comments
by
soulmate
, 06-02-2011 at 12:28 AM (680 Views)
20110601193328

I say what the haay! Lol. Might as well. Have fun. Relax and adjust to the situation. There is no harm in that. I assure you... provided that you are open-minded. However, if you're the opposite, I can't garentee anything. Ha ha ha.

Anyway, I have been meaning to write for quite sometime now. But I haven't wrote for so long, I forgot how to write. Ha ha. There are so many things, however small things, that I have running through my mind lately. The thing about me is that when I write I like to have a good format, ya know, a structure similar to that of the APA or MLA, as enforced in school (I was so used to it). So with all these little things intermittenly fading in and out of my thoughts I won't be able to follow the scholarly format. Thus, I would be all over the place in my train of thoughts, that in turn transcribed onto this, uuhhh, personal journal? Weblog? Whatever. However, now I just realized, what the haay? I'm I serious? Who I'm I trying to impress? This is my personal blog, goddong it. Oh wait. It's coming back to me now. I remember now why I was hesitant to write a blog.

That a member (cur) of the previous KL version scolded me for my writing was why I felt discouraged to write. But no more of that now. The person (cur) couldn't write themself by any means. Lol. Interesting how cur insulted my opinion and virtually graded my personal blog. WTH, cur? Cur is not registered at this newer KL website, I don't think. Anyway, cur was very fancy with the terminologies and expressions. But cur was not making any sense. I guess cur was just trying to show off the newly learned vocabularies. Which was fine with me but cur had to come on me like he has a PhD in English or something, and for no considerable reason. Freaken guy. I wish we had the KL police we have now back then. Enough about cur. On to the next.

Talking about KL police or the site police, how about the site police we have now? And after we had the the discussion on one of the threads where National Security meets Civil Liberty (http://www.khmerlife.com/threads/453...omply-with-tsa) and clash? The book, "1984," by George Orwell, this is it. Freaken Big Brother is watching us and monitoring our every move, however on a small scale in relation to this KL police matter, but still, it's privacy infringement in concept, I think. Anyway, what I'm trying to say is the concept of National Security versus Civil Liberty suggests that are you willing to give some up some Civil Libterty to get some Security? We have these police to watch and monitor the website (safeguard our security and well being) but at the same time they're micro-policing the feces out of this website (overstepping civil liberty boundaries). I'll give you an example. They're so vigilant that it's almost to the point where they're telling me what I "need" to do around the site (because they have been watching). That is quite authoritatively demanding. I interpret that to be a demand as to what I can or can not do. WTH, sir? Are you serious right now? Another example is at one point I commented on one of the pictures about how a woman is "cute," the police subsequently commented that the woman is "16" years old as if I was tryig to get with her. Sir, are you being serious right now? You are policing this website to the teeth, are you not? I don't think I feel very comfortable with you being all over my grill like that. And not to mention the fact, why are you always invisible?

So those are the cases at hand.

More to follow. I am going to read some more criminal profiling. Cheers.
Categories
Uncategorized

Comments

  1. VIB0L's Avatar
    Haha. I comment as a normal member. The moderator status is only to edit and rid of spam. I made the same reference in the old KL to other photos. I'm telling you she's 16 because, well she's 16. I see a blue car, I'm say, oh thats a blue car. You take things too seriously. I wonder why do you take every comment seriously as an "order" to do something when it's just an opinion. Relax a bit. Maybe I should refer you to my thread about me just deleting spam and only editing upon request of other members. Again, relax. Oh wait, maybe I shouldn't say that, you might think I'm ordering you to relax or else... Hahaha, funny.
    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
  2. Icyfrozen's Avatar
    Its just an online. relax. haha
    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
  3. soulmate's Avatar
    Sir, paint me as a person to take things seriously or however you like, but do you get the point? Asiding from defending yourself as to your action, have you grasp the point I'm trying to convey? From reading your comment, does not appear you hvae got it. Wanna try it again? As a normal member? Round two.
    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
  4. KHEN's Avatar
    lol keep writing bro . last para was gewd.
    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
  5. soulmate's Avatar
    I'm quite aware of that. In fact, I have been preaching that online activity is a form of entertainment. Lets hear some good logicality.

    Quote Originally Posted by Icyfrozen
    Its just an online. relax. haha
    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
  6. soulmate's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by KHEN
    lol keep writing bro . last para was gewd.
    Thanks, bro. Please rate. Cheers.
    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
  7. KHEN's Avatar
    rate where? im still getting use to site
    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
  8. soulmate's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by KHEN
    rate where? im still getting use to site
    Up top, to the right of the title right above the number of comments, bro. Thanks.
    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
  9. VIB0L's Avatar
    Funny again. I know the girl in person. Hell, she is cute. If I see a 2 year old and she's cute, I will say she's cute. If she's 16 years old and she's cute, I will say it's cute. No one said there's anything wrong with telling a girl she's cute regardless of age. I merely said she's 16. Why are you even on that issue?

    Oh, what have I told that you "need" to do? And was there a threat involve? I really don't remember me threatening people on what to do. Um, I hate to break it to ya, but monitoring the site is what a moderator does. I'm not sure if you've been to other sites with moderators, but that's pretty much what they do. So you're saying a moderator shouldn't moderate a site they're assigned to? Weird. Haha.

    Oh, lastly, there really isn't any privacy infringement when you post publicly on a public site. The word "police" is funny to me.
    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
  10. soulmate's Avatar
    Ok, Sir. Again, you're still trying to defend yourself and missing the point. I said, as a normal member, do you get the message and what would your response be regarding National Security and Civil Liberty? Stop trying to defend yourself. Those were just examples illustrated and used to explain the concept of the issue at hand; National Security vs Civil Liberty. Round Three.
    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
  11. VIB0L's Avatar
    Defending myself? Hahaha. I guess you're the only missing it. Maybe you should look up civil liberties again. I'm actually practicing it right now. I have no interest about National Security and Civil Liberty so that's why I'm not discussing it, not because I missed your point. I really don't care for it, well on KL anyways.

    But you used an example involving our interaction, therefore, I am explaining to you what civil liberty, but on a smaller scale in the form of KL.

    But I'll humor you and ask, "What do you think your civil liberty is on here or anywhere for that matter?" I'm guessing "freedom of expression or freedom of speech?"

    Round Four.
    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
  12. soulmate's Avatar
    Sir, you should have told me from the get-go that you take no interest in the subject matter. Also, I can't be missing the point if you never told me your intention. I guess I was supposed to guess. Lol.
    And uhhh also, the only time you explained anything was when you said, "I'm practicing it right now." Which I understood clearly. But elaborate on how an example of our interactions can be served as an explanation to enlighten me on Civil Liberty.

    I know you are exercising your Civil Liberty. I'm well aware of it now that you mention your disinterests. No I don't need to look it up because you were slow to let me know that you wanted no part in this. Therefore, subject closed. So disregard the explanation requested.

    On another note, so this is the Vibol that everyboody was talking about. Turning the table under the guise of sarcasm is your specialty. I see it. I like it.

    Thanks for trying to entertain with those questions but if you have no interests, what's the point? You claimed you know what it is and I sure do know what mine is. We'll just leave it at that. Round End.
    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
  13. VIB0L's Avatar
    KL has been dead for the longest time. I like your blog, so I commented. I apologize about the sarcasm, it's just my personality, online and offline. I have no interest in making the subject matter a bigger discussion than what it is. I don't like arguing or debating, and the subject of Civil Liberty can go that route, so I avoid it. The same with religion and politics.

    Part of Civil Liberty is the obvious one like speech and such, but there is one about the freedom to defend oneself, even though it was meant in the form of a court hearing, but I was playing around with the idea since you mentioned why was I defending myself. That is all.
    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
  14. soulmate's Avatar
    No harm no foul, my friend. Online interactions are all a form of entertainment to me. Just like you, I call it how I see it, in the cyber world as well the real world. And true, the subject on Civil Liberty is all but intellectual debates, indeed. As are religion and politics.

    What are you have mentioned are the Bill of Rights, which rightfullly so, an element of Civil Liberty. There is no Amendment that allows for self defense. But the sixth Amendment does state that you have the right to confront your accuser/witness in court and that you are entitled to an attorney if you can't afford one. The fifth Amendment gives you the right to say nothing... so yes acting on your own behalf, you exercised your rights, broadly.

    Well time for bed for me. It was good. We'll do it again some other time. On subjects unrelated to politics, religion, or Civil Liberty. Better yet, no debates. Lolz. Cheers.
    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
  15. Mizz_Luv3r's Avatar
    Soulmate, stop taking things so literally. Happy Wednesday!
    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
  16. soulmate's Avatar
    Please don't ever do that... not with me anyway. Don't ever walk into a situation with a bias beforethought. And if you do, I wouldn't scold you if you didn't say anything. Thanks.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mizz_Luv3r
    Soulmate, stop taking things so literally. Happy Wednesday!
    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
Copyright © 2012 KhmerLife.com. All rights reserved.